What a fitting, farewell tribute from the Apartheid Zionist Entity (A.Z.E.) to its departing dupe President of the United States: now such a lame, ruptured duck that humilitating him and his token-black Secretary of State goes almost unnoticed by the kept corporate camp followers who call themselves America's "watchdog" media.
A commenter on Juan Cole's "Informed Comment" blog noticed it though.
Quote: At 5:12 PM, JeffGuy said ... Juan, there is a truly extraordinary article about Bush being interrupted during a speech so he can take orders from PM of Israel Olmert (and the pay off is that of course Bush comes off the podium, takes his orders and does what Olmert demands). Surely this deserves an article if you have the time.
At 5:12 PM, JeffGuy said ...
Juan, there is a truly extraordinary article about Bush being interrupted during a speech so he can take orders from PM of Israel Olmert (and the pay off is that of course Bush comes off the podium, takes his orders and does what Olmert demands). Surely this deserves an article if you have the time.
An article, indeed. What an ironic, contemptuous send-off for the hapless Dubya who began his miserable misrule eight years ago by unleashing Ariel Sharon (the butcher of Palestinian Arabs in Lebanese refugee camps) against the Palestinians -- yet again -- in the West Bank and Gaza, babbling: "Sometimes a show of force by one side can really clarify things." Oh, yeah. Sure. definitely. Deputy Dubya: going out the way he came in -- a complete stooge for whatever barbarisms the Apartheid Zionist Entity demands that America subsidize, arm, and mindlessly celebrate.
I've got some more material from Seymour Hersh and Tony Karon to post as background information for those Americans who don't undrestand how stupid the apartheid zionists consider them, but that will come in a subsequent post. For now: No one respects a kiss ass, most especially apartheid zionists who don't even have to break a sweat terrorizing American officials into abject compliance. Or, as Charles Sanders Peirce put it back in the late nineteenth century:
"Where two faiths flourish side by side, renegades are looked upon with contempt, even by the party whose beliefs they have adopted."
So explains the Republicans' loathing for Bill Clinton after he shamelessly capitulated to every extortionate demand they could throw at him. So explains the undisguised disdain that apartheid zionists have for all Americans who will give the A.Z.E. everything it demands without even the barest of a whimper of protest. Apartheid zionists will greedily take the uncritical largesse, of course. They just won't for a moment respect anyone dumb enough to supply it.
Oh, well. The broke and deadbeat Lunatic Leviathan can always ask the communist Chinese for more loans to help finance the A.Z.E.'s "ethnic cleansing" of those Palestinian Arabs who will never forget or accept what the A.Z.E. and America have mercilessly done to them for the last sixty years as conscious, deliberate "state" policy.
More on this predatory, pariah partnership -- with special reference to the U.S./A.Z.E. policy called "Plan B" (otherwise known as the "failed neighborhood") later. For, as Atilla the Hun famously said: "It is not enough that I succeed. Everyone else must fail." I think that about sums up this installment of the barely audible "Mew and Sigh."
Thanks, Stan, for taking up the Peirce quote in association with Orwell's statement about the revolutionary nature of telling the truth in an environment of official lies (what I prefer to call Manufactured Mendacity and Managed Mystification). While possibly connected, I think the two citations have somewhat different origins and references. For example:When I first recited Peirce's dictum on inbred tribal fidelity to my Taiwanese wife, she immediately got it and replied with the Chinese equivalent: "Our enemies we just kill right away, but traitors we torture." This put me in mind of the old Arkansas joke about the hillbilly bridegroom who angrily returned to the family homestead the moring after his wedding night -- without his new bride. When his perplexed pappy demanded to know: "Wher'z yore wyfe?" the belligerent boy answered: "I shot her, paw!" When daddy inquired: "Why'd jew dew that?" the boy cried out in humiliated embarassment: "She were a virgin, Paw!" Agreed the proud and understanding papa: "Well, then I don't blame ya, sun. If she weren't good enuf fer her own fambly, then she sure as hell ain't good enuf fer ours."The Republicans loathed Bill Clinton most of all because he would betray his own party in a heartbeat if he thought he could "triangulate" away from the despised "liberals" and towards his swell, new friends in the reactionary, Republican-dominated Congress who would help him "get something [the Republicans wanted] done." What kind of person could ever trust or respect a traitor to his own tribe who would do a spineless thing like that? Naturally, the Republicans impeached Bill Clinton in an instant over a blow job, just to "stain" his record; just because they could. The Republicans respect a kick in the groin, but never a kiss on the ass. They'll take the tush-smooching, of course, and even demand more. But they'll never hold the ass-kisser in anything but contempt. I think Peirce had this sort of attitude in mind. I know I certainly feel that way about Zell Miller and Holy Joe Lieberman.
Supported videos include:
Create your own forum with Website Toolbox!